Astronomy 505: Galaxies
Time and location:
Friday 9:30am - 12:30pm Elliott 503 (Chartroom).
Course schedule/content (linked lecture slides):
Lecture notes
Sept 5 - Introduction to large galaxy surveys - Sara Ellison
Sept 12 - Mysql and databases - Luc Simard.
Sept 19 - Photometric properties of galaxies - Luc Simard
Sept 26 - Practical application of artifcial neural networks in astronomy -
Hossein Teimoorinia
Oct 3 - Data manipulation and visualization - Asa Bluck
Oct 10 - Spectroscopic properties of galaxies - Sara Ellison
Reading list
Sept 5 -
Silverman et al. (2009) on the star forming properties of high z AGN.
Catinella et al. (2013) gas fractions and environment in GASS.
Sept 12 -
Forster-Schreiber
et al. (2009) on the SINS survey.
Bolton et al. (2006)
on the SDSS/HST gravitational lens survey
ALSO! Please see these links for useful background material for Luc's lecture:
1 2 3 4
Sept 19 -
Simard et al. (2011) on bulge-disk decompositions in SDSS
Mendel et al. (2014) on stellar mass determinations in SDSS
Sept 26 -
Teimoorinia (2012) Spectral classification in the CDFS
Teimoorinia & Ellison (2014) Line flux predictions for SDSS
Oct 3 -
Woo et al. (2013) on environmental dependent quenching
Bluck et al. (2014) on bulge mass dependent quenching
Oct 10 -
Mannucci et al. (2010) The fundamental metallicity relation
Ellison et al. (2013) properties of post-mergers
Project options (and supervisors)
- Ben: SFRs as a function of morphological properties (Asa).
Investigate whether the enhancement of SFR in galaxy pairs (e.g. Ellison et al.
2008, Scudder et al. 2012, Patton et al. 2014) varies as a function of morphological
type. We will use new bulge + disk photometric ratios, and stellar masses to separate
the host galaxies, and their pairs, into spheroids, composites (high and low B/T ratios),
and disks. For this we will use the full sample (as in Qamar et al. in prep.) to enhance
the value of looking at different morphologies. Expectation: more spheroid dominated
systems will experience less star formation enhancement. But is this the case? Also,
how does this vary with major or minor pair?
- Mara: Clustering of satellites around active galaxies (Sara). What triggers
an AGN? There is strong evidence that at least some AGN are triggered by
mergers (e.g. Ellison et al. 2011; Satyapal et al. 2014 and references
therein). However, not all AGN are likely triggered by mergers. In this
project, you will investigate whether optical AGN identified in SDSS
have an excess of satellite galaxies relative to non-AGN. Recently,
this experiment has been done by Pace and Salim (2014) for radio loud
AGN and a positive signal found. But is this the case for optical AGN?
- Divya: Does nuclear activity affect the SFR in galaxy mergers (Sara)?
As described above, galaxy mergers can trigger AGN and new star formation.
However, most metrics that measure SFRs can not be applied to galaxies
that have AGN (Brinchmann et al. 2004). However, we have recently used
artificial neural networks to predict IR luminosities that can be
used to predict SFRs even in AGN galaxies. This project will investigate
whether the SFR enhancements seen in AGN galaxies are the same as those
without AGN.
- Connor Disk shapes and sizes (Luc Simard, Dave Patton). Determining whether galaxy
disks have an intrinsic ellipticity (or not) is pretty fundamental to our
formation models. Ryden (2004) a relatively small sample, which can be greatly
improved with SDSS. Questions include: does disk ellipticity and thickness
vary as a function of, e.g. bulge mass, and local density. Do galaxy-galaxy
interactions make disks more elliptical? Or thicker? Or both? Do you have
thicker disks for larger bulge stellar mass (Toth and Ostriker 1992)?
- Jared: HI gas consumption in different environments (Sara). We have used
ANN to predict HI masses for ~150,000 galaxies in SDSS, which far
outstrips the largest measured samples to date (e.g. Haynes et al. 2011;
Catinella et al. 2012). In this project,
you would investigate gas content as a function of different environments
(groups, clusters, mergers) and as a function of AGN activity.
See supervisors for more details. Projects allocated on a first
come, first served basis
Assessment and deadlines:
10% - contributions to weekly paper discussions
10% - contributions to weekly project updates
20% - project presentation (15 minutes)
60% - final project (due Dec 15)